Today, we walked to a human rights organization in
downtown Tucson that advocates for border and immigrant communities. Their
Policy Director is a Tohono O´odham and activist who advocates that everyone
can contribute to ending human suffering on the border. If people know that
others are dying in their backyard, they have a moral obligation to prevent
these deaths.
Much love,
The person we spoke with became an activist
after acknowledging that around 50% of immigrant deaths occurred on the Tohono
Nation, according maps of migrant deaths in the Sonoran desert created by a
local humanitarian aid group. He asserts that, sadly, the vast number of
immigrants dying make immigrant death seem natural. When people start seeing
migrant death as a natural process, people do not do anything to prevent it.
Before working for the organization we visited, our host was a Presbyterian
minister on the Tohono O’odham Nation. During this time, he became frustrated
when people from the community´s Church were not doing anything to prevent
deaths happening around 5 miles away from their community. When he tried to
challenge them, they, especially the elders, replied asking “why would you help
people who are doing illegal activities, people who are criminals?” Our host
replied “yes, legally immigrants without documents are breaking the law and
because of this, you can argue they are doing a criminal activity. However, we
have to accept this even if we do not like it and move on, the point is that people
are dying outside.” Then he asked the elders “what is more important? A
migration law or a moral law?” He tried to convince them by saying that we
should all try to meet the moral and the law arguments in the middle to prevent
more human suffering.
After this, the speaker learned that, the same
as the Government of Tohono Nation and the U.S. government, the people in his
Church wanted to stay in the “safe position.” Then, he became and an O´odham
activist by leaving water for immigrants crossing through the Nation´s territory
as well as working with local organizations to fight for immigrant´s rights. He
argues that his job as an activist stays faithful to culture, roots and
O´odham´s tradition of hospitality and moral code. Unfortunately, the
Government of the Tohono Nation complains about his work since they argue that the
numbers of people dying in O’odham territory are exaggerated in many reports
and that leaving water encourages people to use the Nation’s territory as a
migration route. He says that the Nation police often confiscate the gallons of
water he leaves in this territory. He used to have 4 water stations, 100
gallons each and all of them were confiscated.
In October 21, 2011, the newspaper of the Tohono
Nation, The Runner, Volume 18, Number
20, published an article in which the Nation Police and Pima County Council
proved the percentage of immigrants´ deaths occurring within the Nation
Territory. In this edition Sargent May says that “sometimes we have four to
five (deaths) a week. Last year in 2010 there were a total of 125 immigrant
deaths, and 63 of those were recorded in July.” Our speaker currently uses this
article to defend himself of being accused of defamation.
Our speaker acknowledges that the construction
of the border wall was intentionally to move migration patterns to the Western
desert, in the mountains and harsher climate conditions thinking these will
reduce migrants crossing. However, as a result of this, the number of deaths
increased. Even though, the Tohono Nation obtains money from the US Government,
our host thinks that the Nation Council is afraid of risking that money by
resisting the Border Patrol policies. He asked “if we hold Border Patrol for
the deaths of immigrants, shouldn´t we also hold people in the O´odham Nation
Government for not doing anything?” He also expressed his anger at other local
humanitarian aid organizations for refusing to put water inside the O´odham
Nation claiming that they do not want to break the tribe´s laws. And he asked how
it is possible that one group calls themselves humanitarians but they allow the
Nation to break moral laws? He called this moral hypocrisy. He also spoke about
how easy it is for people to talk about the number of deaths without
acknowledging that they are talking about people, people with families, people
suffering, trying to cross the desert.
When one of our classmates asked him how
different violations of the Tribe´s laws and territories is modern
colonization, he replied that this kind of concerns is part of “White Society
Burdens” when some people focus too much on the things that have passed in the
past and they do not allow themselves to act in the present. He said that it is
important to acknowledge how Tohono O’odham territory is being occupied and
destroyed and it is still not respected by the US government, however, this gives
us no reason to avoid preventing deaths.
And so! Me, as María Ramos, Earlham College
student, student at BSP 2013, Spring semester, would like to ask, taking into
consideration how privileged we are that we can even consider this question, is
it valid argument to do not do anything to prevent human suffering in order to
respect the boundaries of religious/cultures/nations spaces?
Much love,
María Ramos
No comments:
Post a Comment